The ejectment order against provincial government case law pakistan Diaries

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of the information contained on this site, or the information linked to over the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

For legal professionals, there are specific rules regarding case citation, which fluctuate depending to the court and jurisdiction hearing the case. Proper case legislation citation in a very state court may not be proper, as well as accepted, for the U.

In addition it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and one hundred twenty on the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to seek cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but will not be binding precedent.

The Supreme Court's explanation from Fida Muhammad v. Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and others (2021 SCMR 1895), Evidently distinguished between up-gradation and promotion. Promotion consists of a move into a higher position with increased responsibilities and rank. Upgradation, over the other hand, offers financial relief by positioning an employee in a higher spend scale, without shifting their task duties or position. It is a mechanism designed to address the stagnation of employees who have remained while in the same shell out scale for a protracted time, particularly when they absence prospects for promotion. Upgradation is usually a policy Software used to relieve the hardship of extended-term stagnation. Read more

Just some years back, searching for case precedent was a complicated and time consuming undertaking, demanding persons to search through print copies of case legislation, or to purchase access to commercial online databases. Today, the internet has opened up a number of case regulation search opportunities, and many sources offer free access to case legislation.

PLR is often a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :

In federal or multi-jurisdictional law systems there might exist conflicts between the various lessen appellate courts. Sometimes these differences is probably not resolved, and it might be necessary to distinguish how the legislation is applied in one district, province, division or appellate department.

Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely accessible. Decisions in the lessen (trial) courts usually are not generally published or dispersed.

Article 199 of the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other enough remedy is provided by law." It really is nicely-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust offered remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether All those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

The police have the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a Court for cognizable offenses. The existence of this power casts an obligation to the police, and they must bear in mind, as held by this Court from time to time in its many pronouncemnts, that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Primarily, the Police Officers are required to protect and never abduct. Read more

Summaries of cases that shape the lives of young individuals, guaranteeing a further understanding of justice within the juvenile system. Knowledge that matters, crafted for legal professionals and lovers alike.

17 . Const. P. five/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have heard the learned counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments given that the issues in the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section seven(one) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession in the subjected premises on the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as being the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding click here of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is subject for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *